[xep-support] Re: Difference in behavior between XEP 4.30.915 and 4.27.709?

[Eugene Protasov]

Hellow Harvey, Paul J.,

the attachment has a test using 'page-number-citation' & 
'page-number-citation-last'.

Description of the test. In two streams of pages there are links to the 
ids of these streams. The links are in table cells.Here I tried to 
repeat the alleged bug. Note the paginations of streams use different 
formats.

The test is successful in XEP version 4.30.915. I ask you to check your 
data.


Merry Christmas,

Eugene Protasov, RenderX.

22.12.2020 14:18, Harvey, Paul J. EOP/OMB (Contractor) пишет:
>
> I have a stylesheet which contains this…
>
> <fo:table-celldisplay-align="after">
>
> <fo:page-number-citationref-id="{generate-id(.)}"/>
>
> </fo:table-cell>
>
> When I run a transformation with it using version 4.27.709 it runs 
> fine. When I omit the -valid flag, I see the message “(validate 
> [validation OK])”
>
> I handed the stylesheet and source XML file to another developer who 
> ran it against XEP version 4.30.915 and it failed with the message:
>
> /“Element 'fo:page-number-citation' cannot be a child of 
> 'fo:table-cell'. Only block-level elements are permitted in this 
> context./”
>
> Is there a difference between the versions such that 4.30 is enforcing 
> a rule 4.27 did not?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> (*) To unsubscribe, please visit http://lists.renderx.com/mailman/options/xep-support
> (*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://w
> ww.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.renderx.com/pipermail/xep-support/attachments/20201224/1b481f5d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: idroot.fo
Type: text/xml
Size: 3510 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.renderx.com/pipermail/xep-support/attachments/20201224/1b481f5d/attachment.xml>