[xep-support] Trouble with tables

[daniel.r.boughton at rrd.com]

Thanks for clarifying that for me.  I did not realize that there was an 
order of precedence for border styles.  I guess that would make sense 
though, because you would need a way to resolve different adjacent borders 
when doing a border-collapse.

The problem that I have with using "hidden" though is that it appears to 
use the color white to do the hiding.  If I have a row where I've set the 
background color to 50% gray and  I use hidden on a border, I can still 
see where the border should be because it is now white on a gray 
background.  I would think that you would want hidden to use the current 
background color.




"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman at CraneSoftwrights.com> 
Sent by: owner-xep-support at renderx.com
04/24/2009 04:25 PM
Please respond to
xep-support at renderx.com


To
xep-support at renderx.com
cc

Subject
Re: [xep-support] Trouble with tables






At 2009-04-24 15:27 -0500, daniel.r.boughton at rrd.com wrote:
>I am having some trouble overriding borders at the cell level of a 
>table.  If the borders are defined at the table-column level I am 
>not able to turn off a border at the table-cell.  I can override 
>some border settings at the table-cell, but not all.  If I define 
>border "1pt solid black" at the table-column I cannot change it at 
>the table cell, but if I define a border of "1pt dotted black" at 
>the table-column, I can set it to a "solid" border at the cell, but 
>I cannot set it to "none".  If I define all borders at the cell 
>level and not at the column, I can do all the overrides I want.

Remember that there are two kinds of precedence going on here, that 
of table vs column vs cell, and that of border style.

There are two ways to get no border when dealing with the style:

    "none" - which has lower precedence than any other border style
    "hidden" - which has higher precedence than any other border style

>Attached is an example FO that shows the problem I am having.
>
>I just want to know if this is the expected behavior, or if this is a 
bug.

I don't think it is a bug.  I just changed the second table to 
"hidden" and the left border cannot be seen.

I hope this helps.

. . . . . . . . . Ken

p.s. this is part of the material I am teaching in June in a 
publicly-subscribed class as I am teaching about every formatting 
object in XSL-FO 1.1

--
XSL-FO/XSLT/XQuery hands-on training - Los Angeles, USA 2009-06-08
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
Video lesson:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
Video overview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman at CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo at renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service 
http://www.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.renderx.com/pipermail/xep-support/attachments/20090427/d42bb6b0/attachment.html>