[xep-support] Re: folio-suffix content model?

[Dave Pawson]

On 14 January 2011 12:26, Michael Sulyaev <msulyaev at renderx.com> wrote:

> The is a special note in XSL 1.1 spec for this case:
> "An fo:folio-suffix is not permitted to have an fo:page-number,
> fo:page-number-citation, or fo:page-number-citation-last as a descendant."
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_folio-suffix

> The fact that you could fool the validator by wrapping
> fo:page-number-citation-last in an fo:inline inside an fo:folio-suffix --
> that is a bug. However, we won't fix it at the place where it is, because
> the whole stylesheet that performs folio-* resolution we be re-factored into
> Java code for performance.
>
> Anyway, I'll pay attention to these possible loops and their detection.
> Thanks for reporting!

Yes, I'd missed the note.

Thanks Micheal.

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

!DSPAM:87,4d30415c63731742210042!