SV: Re: [xep-support] keep-together

[G. Ken Holman]

At 2007-03-19 16:50 +0100, Mati Hadi wrote:
>Is there any way to define different periorities for
>keep-together against one another.

Nothing can be added to Michael's previous answer:

>--- Michael Sulyaev <msulyaev at renderx.com> skrev:
> > You are correct, the proper approach to 'proiritize'
> > the keep
> > constraints is to supply integer values for the
> > keep-* attributes as
> > required.
> >
> > However, footnote 21 on page 21 of the XEP 4.9
> > Reference for Java states
> > that only "auto" and "always" values [for keeps] are
> > recognized
> > properly: numeric values are treated as "always".

Michael's answer is quite explicit ... there is only one way and XEP 
doesn't support it.  I'm sure they will address it in their own time 
but it is not available at this time.  Michael works for the company 
so I very much respect his opinions in this matter.

Can you clarify the nature of your question?  It sounds like you are 
just repeating your question which, of course, doesn't change the answer.

. . . . . . . . . . . Ken

--
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training
RSS feeds:     publicly-available developer resources and training
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman at CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo at renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html