[xep-support] Different performance on different systems

Jirka Kosek jirka at kosek.cz
Fri Sep 2 05:13:01 PDT 2005


uwe.goersch at lhsystems.com wrote:

> In order to find out the reason for the different behaviour, I would like to know what the XEP renderer is doing at this point of progress. Did anyone face similar problems or does anyone have a hint how to analyze this problem best?

I found very massive performance decrease when configuration files 
(xep.xml and included files) were stored on Novell network drive.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
   Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
      Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
        Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3158 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.renderx.com/pipermail/xep-support/attachments/20050902/5814a1f1/attachment.bin>


More information about the Xep-support mailing list